The Lahore High Court has recently taken a significant step by demanding a written report from the Punjab Inspector General of Police. This report is to include details about the action taken in the May 9 cases and the procedure of geo-fencing. Justice Anwarul Haq Pannun, presiding over the hearing, emphasized the importance of ensuring the safety and rights of individuals, stating that no one should be left to suffer in jail after being re-arrested upon release. Let’s delve into the details of this crucial court session and its implications for the justice system.
Re-arrest After Release Sparks Concern
In a petition filed by Kulsoom Arshad, a woman challenging the re-arrest of her son, Shoaib Arshad, after his release, Justice Pannun expressed his discontent. He directly addressed the Punjab Inspector General of Police, emphasizing his role as the police chief of the largest province in the country. The court expects full support from the police to uphold justice. Justice Pannun raised concerns about the practice of releasing citizens in one case, only to arrest them in another. The court questioned why the law was not being followed and urged the need for transparency and fairness in the judicial process.
Importance of Following the Law
The Inspector General of Police informed the court about the damage caused to significant installations, including the Jinnah House, during the incidents on May 9. The police have been carrying out arrests using the technique of geo-fencing. The incidents, reminiscent of the Taliban’s style, occurred in various cities, including Gujranwala and Lahore. The IG assured the court that after conducting identification parades, innocent individuals would be released. The police have relied on evidence from social media and CCTV footage to make the arrests.
READ MORE: AOC Introduces the AGON Q24G2A/BK Gaming Monitor: Unleashing the Ultimate Gaming Experience
Uncovering Additional Evidence
During the proceedings, the Inspector General of Police revealed the discovery of two WhatsApp groups linked to the incidents. Prompt action is being taken based on the information obtained from these groups. The police are specifically targeting those responsible for assaulting policewomen and officers. To ensure a thorough investigation, Joint Investigation Teams (JITs) have been formed to handle the listed cases. The court expects all cases to be dealt with strictly in accordance with the law, without favoritism or bias towards any individual or group.
Serving the People, Upholding the Law
Justice Pannun stressed that everyone involved, including the police, the judiciary, and government institutions, are public servants who receive salaries in return for their service. The appointment is not to rule over the people but to serve them. The court emphasized the importance of treating every case with the utmost diligence, adhering to the law without giving priority to anyone. Justice Pannun reminded the Inspector General of Police that retirement awaits both of them and that they will continue to live in the same society even after their tenure.
Conclusion
The Lahore High Court’s decision to demand a written report from the Punjab Inspector General of Police regarding the action taken in the May 9 cases and the procedure of geo-fencing highlights the court’s commitment to ensuring justice and upholding the law. The concerns raised about re-arrests after release and the need for transparent and fair practices underscore the court’s dedication to protecting the rights and well-being of individuals. This case serves as a reminder that public servants have a responsibility to serve the people and act in accordance with the law, without any bias or favoritism. The court’s pursuit of accountability sets an important precedent for the justice system, promoting a society where the rule of law prevails.
